Digital Dentistry Daily is an independent publication focused on digital dentistry news, product intelligence, workflow analysis, software developments, research coverage and clinical guidance. This editorial policy explains how we choose stories, how we report them, and how we handle independence, sourcing and updates.
What we cover
We cover developments relevant to digital dentistry professionals, including intraoral scanners, CBCT and AI tools, CAD/CAM software, guided surgery, photogrammetry, laboratory workflows, implant components, education and events. We may publish straight news, research summaries, market analysis, technical explainers, comparisons, opinion-informed analysis and video tutorials.
How stories are selected
We prioritize topics that are useful to clinicians, laboratories, distributors, educators and manufacturers working in digital dentistry. Relevance, novelty, practical impact, reader interest and quality of available evidence all influence whether a topic is covered and how prominently it appears.
Sourcing and verification
We aim to rely on primary or authoritative sources whenever possible, including manufacturer announcements, regulatory information, published studies, conference materials, software release notes and direct product documentation. When a claim cannot be independently verified, we try to attribute it clearly and describe it in appropriate context.
Research and technical coverage
Research and technical articles are written to be practical and readable, but they are not a substitute for clinical judgment, training, manufacturer instructions, legal advice or regulatory guidance. When discussing workflows, materials, software or equipment, we may summarize strengths, limitations and tradeoffs as we understand them at the time of publication.
Independence and conflicts
Editorial decisions are intended to be made independently. Sponsored relationships, advertising, affiliate arrangements, product access or other commercial considerations should not determine whether a topic is covered or what conclusion a piece reaches. If a material conflict, sponsorship or relevant relationship exists for a specific piece, we aim to disclose it clearly.
Reviews, analysis and opinions
Some content on the site includes analysis, interpretation or editorial judgment. Those pieces may discuss market positioning, workflow implications, likely use cases or practical limitations. While we try to be fair and evidence-based, reasonable professionals may reach different conclusions from the same information.
Use of images, embeds and external material
We may use official product images, screenshots, embedded media or other materials for commentary, reporting and educational purposes. Rights to third-party trademarks, names, product images and media remain with their respective owners unless stated otherwise.
Updates and corrections
Articles may be updated after publication to improve clarity, add new information, correct inaccuracies or reflect meaningful developments. When a significant factual error is identified, we aim to correct it promptly and in a manner consistent with our Corrections Policy.
Reader feedback
We welcome constructive feedback, factual corrections and source suggestions. If you believe a published item is inaccurate, incomplete or unfair, please contact the publication through the site’s contact page and include the relevant article link and supporting details.